← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15447/2024bail granted

Uday Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-05Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15447 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- LAKHNAUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Uday Mahto S/o Sri Ashok Mahto R/o vill - Maibi (Rahi tol), ward no. 13, P.S. - Lakhnaur, Distt. - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No 13, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No. 09 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner was apprehended on the spot and total 360 liters of Nepali country made liquor was recovered which was kept under the earth behind the cattle hut of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has no concern with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15447 of 2024(2) dt.05-03-2024 2/3 the alleged recovery. No any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession. Both the seizure list witnesses are police personnel which is complete violation of Section 100 of Cr.P.C. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 13.01.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties as well as period of custody of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, District-Madhubani in connection with Lakhnaur P.S. Case No.09 of 2024.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the chargesheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15447 of 2024(2) dt.05-03-2024 3/3 released on bail on above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) lata/- U T