← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18290/2024bail granted

Anil Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2024-06-28Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18290 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2023 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Anil Sharma Son of Mungan Sharma Resident of Arajpur, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024 Heard Md. Fazle Karim, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rita Verma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhawanipur (Akbarpur) P.S. Case No. 198 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 15.08.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to prosecution case, some unknown miscreants have committed the murder of a girl whose dead body was found in a ditch.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18290 of 2024(4) dt.28-06-2024 2/3 petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused, namely, Parmanand Sharma @ Paro Sharma and except the aforesaid, no other cogent material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the fact that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is not named in the F.I.R and his name has been transpired on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Bhawanipur (Akbarpur) P.S. Case No. 198 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18290 of 2024(4) dt.28-06-2024 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T