← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4146/2024disposed

Arjun Jaiswal @ Arjun Prasad Jaiswal v. The Union Of India

2025-02-18Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4146 of 2024 ====================================================== Arjun Jaiswal @ Arjun Prasad Jaiswal Son Of Late Kali Prasad Jaiswal @Kalicharan Jaiswal Resident of Vilalge-Phulwariya, P.S. Dhaka, District East Champaran at Present Resident of Gangyep MW, Namchi Municipal Council, Namchi Forest Block Namchi South Sikkim, PIn-737126. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India through the Secretary Department of Road Transport and Highways.

2.

National Highways Authority of India, New Delhi through its Chairman. 3.

The State of Bihar through the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Collector-Cum-District Land Acquisition Officer, East Champaran, Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kishore Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

AC to SC-15 Mr. Saket Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Aanimesh Gupta, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to SC-15 and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of NHAI.

2. This writ application has been filed for the following reliefs:- "(I) To get the proper compensation determined according to the present market value through arbitration in terms of provisions of Section 3-G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956 having regard to the commercial nature of the land and till the proper compensation is determined and paid, the possession of petitioner should not be disturbed or taken over.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4146 of 2024(2) dt.18-02-2025 2/3 (II) Alternatively the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed objection regarding the proposed compensation amount and its acceptability which may be referred to competent arbitrator in terms of Section 3-G(5) who would decide it within a time frame after considering the objection, materials and evidences of the petitioner on its merits by condoning the delay in making such objection in the facts of the case an till then the possession of the petitioner should not be disturbed.

(III) Grant any other relief or reliefs as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the petitioner's case."

3. Learned counsel for the NHAI raises preliminary objection to the effect that an alternative remedy is available to the petitioner by way of filing appropriate application under Section 3G(5) of The National Highways Act, 1956, which reads as:

"If the amount determined by the competent authority under sub-section (1) or subsection (2) is not acceptable to either of the parties, the amount shall, on an application by either of the parties, be determined by the arbitrator to be appointed by the Central Government."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the above proposition.

5. In the above view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter in its extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4146 of 2024(2) dt.18-02-2025 3/3

6. Petitioner shall be at liberty to seek remedy before the appropriate forum as may be available to him in accordance with law.

7. If such an application is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority within a period of six weeks from today, the same shall be entertained and the order shall be passed expeditiously, in accordance with law, after hearing the parties, preferably within a period of one year from the date of filing of the application.

8. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

9. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U