← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3732/2024dismissed

Raj Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3732 of 2024 ====================================================== Raj Kumari Devi (wrongly mentioned as 'son of', instead of 'wife of') Ravindra Ram, Resident of Village Talwa, P.S. and Block-Kotwa, DistrictEast Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director, Health Services, Muzaffapur, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 4.

The Civil Surgeon- Cum- Member Secretary, District Health Samittee, East Champaran, Motihari.

5.

The Incharge, Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Kotwa, District-East Champaran, Motihari.

6.

The District Samudaik Utprerak, District Health Samittee, East Champaran, Motihari.

7.

The Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat Raj, Pokhara, Block- Kotwa, DistrictEast Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 03 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of writ nature of mandamus for direction to the Respondents to allow for her duty on the post of the Asha Worker as she has been selected by the selection committee and issued selection letter dated 20.07.2019.

(ii) For further issue direction to Respondents for considering her application dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.3732 of 2024(2) dt.14-03-2024 2/2 01.12.2023 and 23.08.2023 which is pending for due consideration.

(iii) For further give other legal consequential benefit to the petitioner to the post."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondentauthorities for redressal of her subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U