← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35009/2017rejected

Vijay Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-06Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35009 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -219 Year- 2017 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Vijay Rai Son of Chandrika Rai, R/o Village- Madhopur, P.S.- Morhowrah, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 06-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 31.05.2017 in connection with Morhowrah P.S. Case No. 219 of 2017 for offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that his son Pawan Kumar, (deceased) had gone in the Tilak ceremony and also gone to see the orchestra but did not return. In the morning, on information, his dead body was found in the bamboo clump of one Chandrika Rai. It is alleged that the coaccused Bijli Rai and Surendra Rai who had property dispute with

the informant were also indulged in killing his son. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that one of the co-accused Surendra Rai who was having land dispute with the informant has been granted the privilege of bail by this Court and that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of suspicion. He submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses and that he has a clean antecedent.

However, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State vehemently oppose the prayer of bail stating therein that the independent witnesses, who had also gone to watch orchestra, have stated that the petitioner was last seen with the deceased and also near the bamboo clump which is evident from para 22, 24 and 32 of the case-diary. Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage in connection with Morhowrah P.S. Case No.

Chapra, Saran.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) sushma/- U T