Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18575/2024bail rejected

Rudal Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-26Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18575 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2023 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Rudal Ram Son of Late Chandrika Ram Resident of Village- Bankatiya Tola Tad, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 683 of 2023, arising out of Kateya P.S. Case No. 108 of 2023. instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code

3. Prosecution allegation, in short, is that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons armed with weapons went to the house of the informant and started abusing him. On protest, the petitioner gave farsa blow on the head of Balister Ram with an intention to kill him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18575 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties in which both sides received injuries. It is submitted that there is only one lacerated wound caused by hard blunt object. The petitioner is in custody since 21.08.2023 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. Learned APP further submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner is of giving farsa blow on the head of Balister Ram. The injury is on the vital part of the body. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail.

6. Considering the nature of accusation against the petitioner and the gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The prayer is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T