Sandeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24375 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -116 Year- 2016 Thana -DAUDPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Sandeep Kumar Son of Pradeep Prasad , R/o Village- Musahari, P.S.- Daudpur, District- Saran at Chapura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Daudpur P.S.Case No.116 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the case is under Section 395 of I.P.C.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner, no recovery and not put on T.I.P. It is also alleged that he was using looted SIM in the Mobile of his father, as such he has been made accused in this case and he has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about 3 1⁄2 months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24375 of 2017 (3) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection with Daudpur P.S.Case No.116 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T