Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12639 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2021 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== RANJIT YADAV SON OF LATE BHOLA YADAV R/O - KARAMTAR, P.S.- LAXMIPUR, DISTRICT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jyoti Ranjan Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 02-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 290 of 2021 registered for the offence punishable under sections 386/34 of the Indian Penal Code Prosecution case relates to demand of ransom on the mobile of the informant on which informant called the accused on his house to take the money. It is further alleged that two accused persons including the petitioner by covering their faces and registration number of their motorcycle, came to his house. Several villagers caught hold them and on enquiry they disclosed their names as commanders of Zonal Committee of MCC.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12639 of 2022(3) dt.02-01-2023 2/2 has been falsely implicated in this case. Recovered motorcycle does not belong to the petitioner. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioner. After investigation police has filed charge sheet against the petitioner, so there is no chance of tempering with the evidence of the case. It is further submitted that similarly situated other accused person has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 23.12.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48702 of 2022. Petitioner is in custody since 3.10.2021.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 290 of 2021. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U