Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10615/2018bail granted

Muso Yadav @ Musay Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-02-27Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10615 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -2435 Year- 2006 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Muso Yadav @ Musay Yadav, Son of Late Mehtar Yadav, resident of Village- Bishanpur Jichho, P.S.- Lodhipur, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Fandori Yadav, S/o Late Kokai Yadav, resident of Village- Bishanpur Jichho, P.S.- Lodipur (Sabour), District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Smt Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.2435 of 2006 registered for an offence under Section 307 and other allied Sections of the IPC. It has been submitted that the present complaint case has been filed merely on suspicion. There is no eye witness to the occurrence and the petitioner has clean antecedent. The learned APP opposed the submissions.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10615 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 2/2 below within six weeks from today be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of ACJM, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No.C2435 of 2006, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T