Achaldev Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3712 of 2023 ====================================================== Achaldev Singh S/o Gopal Singh Resident of Village-Bakhorapur, P.S.- Barhara, Dist-Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secreary of Rural Works Department, Patna. 2.

The Engineer in Chief Engineer of Rural Works Department. Panta. 3.

The Chief Engineer 3rd of Rural Works Department. Patna. 4.

The Superintending Eng. of Rural Works Department. Sitamadhi. 5.

The Executive Engineer, of Rural Works Department. Sitamadhi 6.

The Executive Engineer, of Rural Works Department, Works Division-Pupri, Sitamadhi.

7.

The Assistant Engineer of Rural Works Department, Works DivisionCharaut, Sitamadhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate Mr.Raj Narain Mishra, Advocate Mr.Vineet Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Pd. Gupta (Gp10) Mr.Virendra Kumar, AC to GP10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 06-04-2023 In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- "That the present writ petition is being filed for challenging the order dated 12.01.2023 passed by Chief Engineer Rural Works Department to debar the petitioner from the work with saying that the petitioner has not completed the work within time and he has not filled reply of so cause and due to which he has been declared as defaulter and debar from the work of the department, the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3712 of 2023(3) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 real fact is that the petitioner has filed an application before Executive Engineer Rural Works Department Pupri to revise the estimate on 14.12.2022 that has not been considered and the order for debarring the petitioner has been passed without considering the application filled by petitioner and without revising the estimate which is against the law and it may be set aside and pass appropriate order according to law as per principle of natural justice."

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition. Such statement is taken on record.

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to the petitioner to invoke remedy before appropriate forum.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Arun Kumar Jha, J) abhishekkr/- U