← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12230/2026bail rejected

Naulesh Kumar @ Naulesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-24Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12230 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2025 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Naulesh Kumar @ Naulesh Paswan Son of Kamlesh Paswan @ Kamer Paswan Resident of Village -Jaman Bigha P.O. -Khalilbad Netaul P.S.- Kadirganj (Wrongly Typed in impugned order as Ghoshi) District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ravi Bhushan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 127(1), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted informant with iron rod due to which he sustained injuries on his head and hand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. The act was without premeditation in a sudden fight. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12230 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that he assaulted informant with iron rod due to which he sustained injuries on his head and fracture injury on the hand. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and nature of injuries allegedly caused by this petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T