← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/745/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Murari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-16Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.745 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-1996 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== MURARI SINGH Son of Braj Kishoi Singh @ Munakka Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Agam Kuan, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Yogendra Singh Son of Late Dashrath Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Sultanganj, P.O. - Bahadurpur, Dist.- Patna. 800026 3.

Sonu Singh @ Nagendra Singh Son of Late Dashrath Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Sultanganj, P.O. - Bahadurpur, Dist.- Patna. 800026 4.

Dhirendra Singh Son of Late Dashrath Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Sultanganj, P.O. - Bahadurpur, Dist.- Patna. 800026 5.

Smt. Ram Raji Devi W/o Late Dashrath Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Sultanganj, P.O. - Bahadurpur, Dist.- Patna. 800026 6.

Minakshi Kumari D/o Late Dashrath Singh Resident of Village - Gandhi Nagar, Plastic Pipe Factory Road, P.S.- Sultanganj, P.O. - Bahadurpur, Dist.- Patna. 800026 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2026 None appeared on behalf of the appellant upon repeated call even on second occasion when this matter was taken on board.

2. Present appeal preferred against acquittal in the year 2020.

3. The defects, was pointed out by office in

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.745 of 2020(3) dt.16-02-2026 2/2 the year 2020 itself which is still pending almost after passing of five years. It transpires that the appellant lost interest in prosecution.

4. Considering the aforesaid, the present appeal stands dismissed in want of prosecution. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Rajeev/- U T