Bipin Kumar @ Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12377 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-923 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Bipin Kumar @ Vipin Kumar S/o Santlal Paswan @ Sant Lal Paswan Resident of Village - Harpur Lahauri, P.S - Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard Mr. Karandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Upendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 14.07.2025 in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 923 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 04.07.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that the petitioner strangled his wife to death and hung her from a fan.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He next submits that it has come during investigation, which is recorded in paragraph no. 10 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12377 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 the case diary that due to some occurrence between the deceased and the petitioner, the deceased committed suicide herself and this incident was witnessed by the daughter of the deceased. The daughter of the deceased had also allegedly seen the victim in a compromising position with the petitioner. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet on 10.10.2025 under Section 108 of BNS against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as the fact that police has submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner under Section 108 of BNS and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 923 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12377 of 2026(3) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T