Multan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.13426 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2017 Thana -SARAI RANJAN District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Multan, Son of Mohd. Khalil, Resident of Village + Post OfficeAhmedpur, Police Station- Sararanjan, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar -2, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Sararanjan P.S.Case No. 43 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420, 419, 465, 467, 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is working on the post of Siksha Swayam Sevi on the forged letter.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed on the recommendation of one Block Programme Co-ordinator, Sri Santosh Kumar and recived stipend but after that, the stipend has stopped and came to know that appointment is false but the petitioner has no role and he was appointed by one Santosh Kumar, Block Programme Coordinator.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13426 of 2018 (2) dt.09-04-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from today, and on surrender, he will be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P.S.Case No. 43 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. and one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

However, it is made clear that once charge sheet is submitted against him, he will have to surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail which will be considered on the basis of materials available at that time.

This application is accordingly disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T