Krishna Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12625 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-606 Year-2025 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Krishna Ram Son of Late Rajman Ram Resident of Village- Netuapatti Bara Bariyarpur, Ward No. 44, P.S.- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 606 of 2025, N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 146 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b), ii(c) and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that 2.100 kg of Ganja was recovered from the possession of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12625 of 2026(2) dt.10-03-2026 2/2 police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He also submits that the alleged recovery of ganja is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/ Special Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 606 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T