← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14352/2023allowed

Mantu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-26Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14352 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2021 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Mantu Singh Son Of Yogendra Singh R/V- Sahraun, P.S.- Gogari (Paura), District- Khagaria 2.

Mithlesh Singh Son Of Yogendra Singh R/V- Sahraun, P.S.- Gogari (Paura), District- Khagaria 3.

Pappu Singh Son Of Ramchandra Singh R/V- Sahraun, P.S.- Gogari (Paura), District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non fulfillment of dowry demand. Petitioners are cousin brother-in-law (CHACHERA BHASUR) of the deceased. It is submitted by learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14352 of 2023(2) dt.26-04-2023 2/3 petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioners are cousin brother-in-law (CHACHERA BHASUR) of the deceased and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband. They lived separately from the deceased as well as husband. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 13.09.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Gogari (Paura) P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14352 of 2023(2) dt.26-04-2023 3/3 349 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T