Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23226 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2020 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR SON OF LALAN YADAV, RESIDENCE OF VILLAGE- HARKESHPUR, P.S. MAHARAJGANJ, DISTT- SIWAN. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Rajani Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-02-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 137 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he stabbed the brother of the informant.

The learned counsel for the informant has submitted that there is direct allegation against the petitioner that he stabbed the informant's brother.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23226 of 2021(3) dt.08-02-2022 2/2 The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injuries are simple in nature.

The FIR shows that the accused persons of this case including the present petitioner were also accused in another case of motor cycle theft and the informant has given his name in that motor cycle theft case and it was the reason that they have assaulted the informant's brother. The paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition shows that another case, i.e. Daraundra P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019, was also against the petitioner. Considering the fact that the petitioner is tampering with the evidence and threatened the witnesses of the motor cycle theft case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) Mahesh/- U T