← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22798/2021dismissed

Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-22Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22798 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2020 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== ARUN YADAV @ ARUN KUMAR YADAV SON OF LATE DHARMDEV YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- AHIRAWA TOLA, P.S.- RAXAUL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate.

For the Informant :

Mr. PRATEEK TANDON, Advocate.

Mr. PIYUSH, Advocate.

For the State : Mr. AJIT KUMAR, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-04-2022 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. Prateek Tandon, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 367 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Chargesheet was submitted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Vide order dated 21.02.2022, this Court had directed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22798 of 2021(6) dt.22-04-2022 2/2 to call for a report regarding the progress in the trial from the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Motihari, East Champaran.

In compliance of the said order vide Letter No. 203 dated 08.03.2022, it has been informed by the trial court that considerable progress has taken place in conduct of the trial and only five witnesses are remained to be examined. Taking into consideration the progress which has taken place in conduct of the trial and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Accordingly, the present bail application is rejected. (Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T