← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30038/2017bail granted

Chandan Ram @ Chandran Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-27Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30038 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2016 Thana -DAUDPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Chandan Ram @ Chandran Ram, son of Dhupnath Ram, resident of Village- Naini, P.S.- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Daudpur P.S.Case No. 145 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation against him is that he was working as 'liner' and he is tempo driver and in the confession of other accused no overt act has been alleged against him and he is in custody for more than four months having clean antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30038 of 2017 (4) dt.27-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Daudpur P.S.Case No. 145 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U