Habibu Rahman @ Habibu Rahman Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20852 of 2019 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50654 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2017 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Habibu Rahman @ Habibu Rahman Khan, aged about 49 years (M), Son of Yasin Khan, 2.
Rahman Khan, aged about 38 years (M) Son of Shanif Khan, 3.
Majhar Khan, aged about 32 years (M) Son of Mofi Ahmad Khan, 4.
Masihu Khan, aged about 35 years (M) Son of Sahmad Khan, 5.
Sonu Khan, aged about 25 years (M) Son of Habibu Rahman @ Habibu Rahman Khan, 6.
Atahar Khan, aged about 36 years (M) Son of Mofi Ahmad Khan, 7.
Amhar Khan @ Azhar Khan, aged about 34 years (M) Son of Mofi Ahmad Khan, 8.
Rinku Khan, aged about 26 years (M) Son of Satahu Khan, 9.
Tinku Khan, aged about 24 years (M) Son of Satahu Khan, 10.
Ashraf Khan, aged about 38 years (M) Son of Late Nurul Khan, 11.
Sahid Khan, aged about 28 years (M) Son of Baned Khan, 12.
Chhotu Khan, aged about 29 years (M) Son of Baned Khan, 13.
Sagar Khan @ Sagir Khan, aged about 25 years (M) Son of Baned Khan, 14.
Rafi Alam Khan @ Rafi Alam, aged about 35 years (M) Son of Rasidul Khan, 15.
Asre Alam Khan @ Asre Alam, aged about 33 years (M) Son of Rasidul Khan, 16.
Wahidun Khan, aged about 58 years (M) Son of Ahsan Ahmad Khan, 17.
Kyamuddin Khan, aged about 28 years (M) son of Wahiuddin Khan, 18.
Babu Khan, aged about 28 years (M) Son of Harun Khan, 19.
Hena Khan @ Heno Khan, aged about 25 years (F) Son of Harun Khan, All resident of village - Pandari, P.S. - Dhaka, district - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajiv Nayan (App 231) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20852 of 2019(2) dt.03-05-2019 2/2 03-05-2019 It appears that the petitioners except petitioner no. 3 in the present case were granted anticipatory bail by this court subject to the conditions that they would surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. Petitioner nos. 2, 7, 11, 12 and 13 however, could not surrender within the prescribed period.
For the reasons stated in the application, in the interest of justice this court modifies the order dated 18.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50654/2017 to the extent that if the petitioner nos. 2, 7, 11, 12 and 13 to whom privilege of anticipatory bail was granted vide order dated 18.10.2017 surrender within a period of two weeks from today they will be enlarged on bail in terms of the order dated 18.10.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50654/2017. No further application for modification shall be entertained.
This application stands disposed of.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T