Abdullah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13711 of 2015 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2013 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Abdullah Son of Mohmood, Resident of village- Jatwa, P.S.- Banjaria, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the State is present.

The petitioner has challenged the order dated 19.07.2013 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in Turkaulia (Banjaria) P.S. Case No. 172 of 2013, whereby cognizance has been taken under Sections 302, 120(B), 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Because of the absence of the learner Lawyer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13711 of 2015(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 the petitioner, this Court is not in a position to know about the stage of the case.

From the perusal of the petition as also the documents annexed thereto, no case appears to have been made out for interfering with the order of cognizance. However, if the petition for discharge, if not already filed and disposed off by the learned Trial Court, may be filed, if so advised, which shall be disposed off by the Trial Court. If the trial of the petitioner has begun, the Trial Court would conclude the trial as early as possible.

All the aforesaid observations would not be of any consequence in case the trial has concluded.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition is dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- U T