Rohit Kumar @ Tuntun Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22989 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-500 Year-2020 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

ROHIT KUMAR @ TUNTUN RAI Son of Late Bishwanath Rai Resident of Village- Nasriganj Kushwaha Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pichhe, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

2.

Gobid Kumar @ Mannu Rai @ Gobind Kumar @ Munnu Rai Son of Late Bishwanath Rai Resident of Village- Nasriganj Kushwaha Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pichhe, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna. 3.

Deepak Kumar @ Nanhki Son of Late Bishwanath Rai Resident of VillageNasriganj Kushwaha Panchayat Bhawan Ke Pichhe, P.S.- Danapur, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant by means of iron rod as well as snatching of Rs. 500/- from his pocket by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22989 of 2021(3) dt.10-02-2022 2/2 further submits that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners.

From perusal of the injury report, it appears that there is only one injury, which is simple in nature as the doctor had opined the same but after discharge slip, the injury was shown grievous in nature.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-Ist, Danapur, Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 500 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T