Meera Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2831 of 2015 ====================================================== Meera Devi W/o - Sri Giradhari Paswan R/o - Village - Kewata, Tole Piparpati, Ward No. 11, P.S. - Dalsingsarai, Distt. - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Samastipur.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur.

4. The Circle Officer, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur.

5. Sri Anjani Chaudhary S/o - Late Nawal Kishore Chaudhry, R/o village - Kewata, Tole Piparpati, P.S. - Dalsingsarai, Distt. - Samastipur.

6. Mila Devi W/o - Sri Deonarayan Paswan R/o - Village - Kewata, P.S. - Dalsingsarai, Distt. - Samastipur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suraj Narain Yadav, Advocate Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, AC to SC 27 For the Respondent No.6 : Mr.Ravindra Kr.Choudhary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-09-2016 After some argument, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the competent authority of the area concerned under the provisions of The Bihar Land Disputes Resolution Act, 2009 (in short, "Act, 2009") for grant of appropriate relief(s) to the petitioner with respect to the lands in question.

Permission is accorded.

The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

It goes without saying that if an appropriate petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner within a period of one month from today with a certified copy of the present order under the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2831 of 2015 (3) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 provisions of the Act, 2009, then the competent authority shall be obliged to initiate a proceeding, which shall be taken to its logical conclusion strictly in accordance with law, but before passing any final order, reasonable opportunity of hearing must be given to the petitioner as also private respondent nos. 5 and 6, besides others, if any.

The parties shall be at liberty to raise all the issues of facts and law before the competent authority, which may be available to them.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Tahir/- U