Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24213/2017bail granted

Suraj v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-21Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24213 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -490 Year- 2015 Thana -KATIHAR District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Suraj, S/o Kalicharan, R/o Bhagwan Chowk, P.S.- Katihar Nagar, DisttKatihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 21-06-2017 Heard both sides.

This is repeat application seeking bail in connection with Katihar Town P.S. case no. 490 of 2015, registered under Sections 341,324 307, 504 and 506/34 of the IPC. Considering the allegations and the other materials reflected from the record his prayer for bail was earlier considered and rejected vide order dated 10.11.2016 (Annexure1) observing as under:- "Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court declines the prayer for bail. Application is rejected.

However, the petitioner shall have liberty to renew his prayer for bail after five months."

It is stated that the petitioner is in custody since 28.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24213 of 2017 (2) dt.21-06-2017 2/2 10.2015 having no criminal antecedents.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V Katihar in connection with Katihar Town P.S case no. 490 of 2015, arising out of Sessions Trial No. 142 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be the own/close family member of the petitioner.

(ii) No sooner the charges are framed the petitioner shall continue to appear before the Court below in person on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive dates, trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U T