← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4862/2020disposed

Rajendra Yadav, v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-04Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4862 of 2020 ====================================================== Rajendra Yadav, s/o Baneshwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Goath, Ward No. 6, Police Station- Ghailarh, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Patna. 2.

The Director, Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Madhepura. 4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reform Madhepura Sadar, District- Madhepura. 5.

Sumod Kumar, Son of Yogendra Yadav, Resident of Village- Jhitkiya, Tola Jaypura, Police Station- Ghailarh, District- Madhepura. 6.

Pramod Kumar, Son of Mahendra Yadav, Resident of Village- Jhitkiya, Tola Jaypura, Police Station- Ghailarh, District- Madhepura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad,Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (SC-19) Mr.Saurabh Kumar AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel.

2. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 27.08.2019 passed by learned D.C.L.R., Madhepura in Land Ceiling Case No. 03 of 1997-98 whereby proceeding of land ceiling case has been dropped and petitioner was directed to receive his deposited amount.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the State submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous, in light of judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.4862 of 2020(3) dt.04-12-2023 2/2 13.10.2023, passed in C.W.J.C.No. 15060 of 2019 and other analogous writ petitions.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the contention made on behalf of State, however; he requests for disposal of the writ petition to avail other remedy.

5. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U