Md. Riyazul @ Riyazul v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24717 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2017 Thana -KOCHADHAMAN District- KISANGANJ ======================================================
1. Md. Riyazul @ Riyazul, Son of Noor Saheb, resident of VillageBanmankhi, P.S.- Banmankhi, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kr Sinha No.2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is allegation of some recovery from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has been arrested at the spot and so far recovery of an old mobile is concerned that has not been put on T.I.P. and so far other articles are concerned, the same do not tally with the list. The petitioner is in custody for about five months and he has no criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24717 of 2017 (3) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M. 1st, Kishanganj in connection with Kochadhaman P.S.Case No.19 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T