Vishwanath Anand v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.488 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1053 of 2018 ====================================================== Vishwanath Anand Son of Sri Anil Kumar, Resident of Ward No.8, Sarabe, District- Madhubani, At present Residing at Village and Post OfficeKabirchak @ Kabichak, Police Station- Sadar, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar Patna, namely, Sri Anand Kishore, Son of name not known.
2.
Mr. Rahul Verma Son of name not known, the Deputy Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar Patna 3.
Mr. Shirshat Kapil Ashok Son of name not known, the Collector, East Champaran 4.
Mr. Krishna Bhushan Kumar Son of name not known, the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat- Areraj, East Champaran.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shambhu Nath Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Abbas Haider, S.C.-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. A show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 4, in which it is stated that the concerned Authority has passed the reasoned and speaking order in compliance of the order dated 15.11.2022 passed in CWJC No. 1053 of 2018.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the decision rendered by the concerned Authority vide order dated 27.03.2023 (Annexure-C) is arbitrary, contrary to established law and lacks proper reasoning.
Patna High Court MJC No.488 of 2023(3) dt.02-04-2025 2/2
4. Considering the arguments advanced on behalf of the parties and after perusing the materials available on record, it appears that the order dated 15.11.2022 has already been complied and hence, no case of contempt is made against the opposite party/s.
5. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 27.03.2023 (Annexure-C) in appropriate forum, as may be advised to him, in accordance with law.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U