Shivji Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12772 of 2019 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67173 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2016 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
Shivji Ram Son of Late Sitai Ram Resident of Village-Diwari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.
2.
Sunil Ram Son of Mahendra Ram Resident of Village-Diwari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.
3.
Bhavesh Ram @ Bhavesh Kumar Son of Late Binod Ram Resident of Village-Diwari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi. 4.
Bindeshwar Ram Son of Late Sitai Ram Resident of Village-Diwari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.
5.
Birendra Ram Son of Mahendra Ram Resident of Village-Diwari, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-09-2020 By way of the instant application preferred under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners have prayed for modification of the order dated 17.12.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67173 of 2018 by which the petitioners were granted pre-arrest bail in connection with Sursand P.S. Case No. 71 of 2016, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks.
The petitioners were neither arrested nor did they
2/3 surrender within the stipulated time. There is no convincing ground taken by the petitioner in the application on the basis of which the prayer for modification of the order dated 17.12.2018 can be allowed.
In that view of the matter, I find no merits in the application. It is dismissed, accordingly.
Since the court proceedings are being conducted through virtual mode and normal court functioning has not been restored till date, it is considered appropriate to adopt the following procedure for communication of the present order:- (i) The order, which has been dictated during the course of proceeding of the virtual court, shall be communicated to me on my email by the Sr.
Secretary.
(ii) The corrected copy of the order shall be transmitted by me from my email id to the Sr. Secretary, which shall be treated to be an authentic copy of the order passed by this Court in the present proceeding. (iii) Hard copy of the order duly signed by me shall be preserved in my residential office for documentation and future use, if any.
(iv) Let a copy of the order be sent to Mr. Pushpendra
3/3 Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners also on his email.
(v) Let steps be taken by the Sr. Secretary/registry for up- loading of the present order without compromising with the norms of social distancing.
rohit/- (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) U T