← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3105/2012dismissed

Bikrama Pandey v. The Union Of India And ORS

2016-04-28Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3105 of 2012 ====================================================== Bikrama Pandey S/O Jeet Narayan Pandey R/O Village- Kargahar, P.S.- Kargahar, District-Rohtas (Sasaram) .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum, New Delhi-1

2. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Chairman 9, Ali Yabar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai

3. The Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 9, Ali Yabar Jugn Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai

4. The General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 9, Ali Yabar Jung Marg, Bandra East, Mumbai

5. Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Block-A, Maurya Lok Complex (3rd Floor), Dakbunglow Road, Patna

6. Prince Kumar, son of Brijesh Kumar Roy, resident of village Mukhraon,P.S. Kuchhila,Dist. Bhabua.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Resp. IOCL : Mr. K.D.Chatterjee, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Advocate Mr. Abhimanyu Deo, Advocate For the Resp. 6 : Mr. Surendra Pd.Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2016 Despite repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition.

2. Learned Senior Counsel Mr. K.D. Chatterjee appearing on behalf of the respondent Corporation submits that the petitioner's candidature has been rejected on the ground that he failed to furnish the requisite affidavit of the co-owners which was a precondition. It is therefore, submitted

Patna High Court CWJC No.3105 of 2012 (5) dt.28-04-2016 that the petitioner was rightly awarded zero marks for capability to provide land and infrastructure.

3. Be that as it may, in view of non-representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran U