Manan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30581 of 2017 (3) dt.10-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.30581 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -264 Year- 2015 Thana -PATRAKARNAGAR District- PATNA ====================================================== Manan Singh, son of Ashok Kumar Singh, resident of Village- Sultanganj, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2016 in connection with Patrakarnagar P.S. Case No. 264 of 2015 for the offences alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against unknown persons. The petitioner's name has surfaced on the extra judicial confessional statement of co-accused Jyotish Yadav. Other co-accused Jyotish Yadav named by Lobis Yadav @ Lohba has been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 20038 of 2017.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30581 of 2017 (3) dt.10-08-2017 (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-X-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, in connection with Patrakarnagar P.S. Case No. 264 of 2015, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/Chandran U T