Isolux Corsan India C And C J V N H 2 v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4332 of 2016 ====================================================== Isolux Corsan India C&C "JV" N H 2, Project Office: KM 883 Main NH-2 Khurmabad, near village Panchpokhri, Tehsil - Kudra, Distt. Kaimur, Bihar, through its Dy. General Manager (Administration) namely Sri Kant & Sri Kant Srivastava, son of late Krishna Kanhaya Lal, Resident of VillageResident of Village- Panchapokhri , PS Kudra, District Kaimur (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar Patna.

3.

The Joint Secretary cum Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Bihar Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate Rohtas, Bihar.

5.

The District Magistrate Aurangabad, Bihar.

6.

The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology, Rohtas, Bihar. 7.

The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology, Aurangabad, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwanand Upadhyay, Advocate.

Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Mr. Shailendra Kumar, A.C. to PAAG-2 For the Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mines.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 04-04-2019 Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 for the State and Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mines are present.

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. It is mentioned in paragraph-4 of the counter affidavit that as provided in Rule (1) of Bihar Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage)

Patna High Court CWJC No.4332 of 2016(2) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 Amendment Rules, 2014, "No person shall be permitted to erect, install or operate a stone crusher outside of leasehold area or stock stone minerals in any form outside the leasehold area for the purpose of being used by crusher".

Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.

This writ application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T