Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16033/2019disposed

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-01Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16033 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR Son of Saheb Singh Ward No. 3, Gaurachak, Budhaura, R/o village- Akhrail, P.S- Alauli, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Begusarai P.S. Case No. 23 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20/22 of N.D.P.S. Act. (N.D.P.S. Case No. 3/19).

Allegation is recovery of 10 Nitravet tablets from the possession of petitioner which is intoxicant and is used to commit theft after intoxicating passengers. Petitioner has criminal antecedents also.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage. However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16033 of 2019(2) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Sessions Judge, Begusarai, in connection with Begusarai P.S. Case No. 23 of 2019 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T