← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4717/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4717 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Pappu Kumar Son of Late Bhushan Prasad, Resident of Village-Chakakil (Rasalpur), P.S.-Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. 2.

Nitish Kumar, Son of Shri Hari Prasad, Resident of Village-Saidpur, P.S.- Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. 3.

Ranvir Kumar, Son of Shri Sudhir Kumar, Resident of Village-Antramchak, P.S.-Ekangarsarai, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. 4.

Abhisek Kumar, Son of Shri Indradeo Prasad, Resident of VillageGaurhapar, P.S.-Chandi, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. 5.

Sunil Kumar, Son of Shri Surendra Prasad, Resident of Village-Gokhulpur, P.S.-Chandi, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. 6.

Shrawan Kumar @ Sarban Kumar, Son of Dashrath Ram, Resident of Village-Gilani, P.S.-Asthawan, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

3.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Sub-Division, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sita Ram Yadav ( GP16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners however, counsel for State is present.

2. Vide order dated 28.03.2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioners on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be

Patna High Court CWJC No.4717 of 2020(3) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that the petitioners are not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U