Bhaskar Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14259 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2024 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Bhaskar Kumar Singh Son of Ramanand Singh Resident of VillageBetaunha, P.S.- Jaynagar, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr. Thakur, Adv Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Adv Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 79/2024 dated 11.09.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(6) and 317(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, two miscreants ridden on the motorcycle are alleged to have looted the Maruti car of the informant on the point of pistol. On hulla, one miscreant fired on the thigh of the informant, causing injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel has submitted that in the FIR, the informant has alleged that he identified one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14259 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 miscreant and the said person was taken to Deodha P.S but in spite of that the present case was instituted against unknown. The petitioner has five antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. As per the seizure list, looted car was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 79/2024, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T