Sukendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3874 of 2022 ====================================================== Sukendra Kumar Singh son of Buddha Dev Singh Resident of VillageRampur Kala, P.O.- Sasaram, P.S.- Natwar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar.

3.

The Additional Principal Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner, Gaya Division, Gaya.

5.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas.

6.

The District Certificate Officer, Rohtas.

7.

The Block Development Officer, Dinara, District- Rohtas. 8.

The Junior Engineer, Block Project Unit, Dinara, Rohtas. 9.

The Block Panchayat Raj Officer, Dinara, Rohtas. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Sarawa, Dinara. 11.

Smt. Manju Devi, Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Sarawa, Dinara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ugranath Mallik For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anjani Kumar ( AAG 4 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 13-04-2022 The petitioner was issued notice under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has already filed objection under Section 9 of the Act but no decision has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.3874 of 2022(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 taken thereon.

At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the State assures the Court that a decision on the objection filed by the petitioner shall be taken at the earliest, in any case not later than four weeks.

The contention of the learned counsel for the State is acceptable.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of on the assurance given by the learned State Counsel. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner.

(Rajan Gupta, J) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Anjani/- U