← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./60/2015dismissed

Kapildeo Sharma v. Patna Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh And ORS

2017-04-12Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh,Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.60 of 2015 In LPA 1146 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Kapildeo Sharma, Son of Late Jai Karan Sharma, Village- Sambhupra, P.O. - Tishkhore, District- Patna, at present residing of Maurya Vihar, Balmi Road, Devi Asthan, Khagaul, Patna-5.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Patna Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh, certified by Khadi and Village Industries commission and acting through its secretary (Mantri) having its Head Office, Muradpur, Patna-4.

2. The Accountant, Patna Zila Zhadi Gramodyog Sangh, Head Office, Muradpur, Patna-4.

3. The Bihar Khadi Gramodhyog Sangh, Muzaffarpur, Head Office, Sarvodya Gram, Muzaffarpur-2.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Sharma For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH AND HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH) 12-04-2017 The present application, under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, has been filed by the petitioner for review of the order, dated 24.06.2016, passed in LPA No. 1146 of 2013, whereby the Division Bench has dismissed the intra Court appeal, preferred by the writ petitioner against the order, dated 16th July, 2013, made by the learned Single Judge, in CWJC No. 8548 of 2006. In course of argument, learned Counsel for the

Patna High Court C. REV. No.60 of 2015 (3) dt.12-04-2017 2/2 petitioner has failed to point out any error apparent on the face of the order under review. He has repeatedly argued that the order passed by the Division Bench in the Letters Patent Appeal is erroneous on merits.

We deprecate the manner in which argument has been advanced. While exercising the jurisdiction of review, this Court would neither rehear the matter nor examine the merits of the order We see no merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √ T X