Lokesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9264 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -87 Year- 2015 Thana -CHATOUNI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Lokesh Kumar Son of Hira Lal Rai @ Mehi Lal Rai, Resident of Mohalla Birsa Nagar Chhota Bariyarpur, P.S. - Chhatauni, District - East Champaran, at present resident of village - Harpur, P.S. - Pipra Kothi, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 29-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 420, 468, 471, 385, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that co-accused Shakil Ansari and Santosh Kumar in connivance with the petitioner Lokesh Kumar and co-accused Rakesh Singh got transferred by a registered sale deed 3 kathas 1/2 dhurs of land of the informant when a fictitious lady Shakila executed the sale deed. The petitioner alleged to have identified Shakila.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9264 of 2016 (2) dt.29-02-2016 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant claims to have purchased the land from Noor Mohammad and co-accused Shakila who is the daughter of Noor Mohammad has executed the sale deed. The petitioner only identified the vendor. It is further submitted that a case is also pending with regard to cause of action before Wakf Board Tribunal and 144 Cr.P.C. proceeding was also initiated.
Considering the accusation in the background of civil nature of dispute and a statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 87 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.