Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18734/2017bail granted

Md. Sohrab v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-23Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18734 of 2017 (3) dt.23-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18734 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -281 Year- 2016 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ====================================================== Md. Sohrab S/o Late Md. Asik, Resident of Village-Mirzapur Bardah, P.S.- Muffasil, District-Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 281 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 (I) (II) of Arms Act.

Allegedly, the petitioner was apprehended and from his possession two country made pistol and one cartridge were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 19.12.2016, chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. The petitioner has been made victim of circumstances.

Learned APP fairly submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for about six months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18734 of 2017 (3) dt.23-06-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Akhilesh Pandey, S.D.J.M., Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 281 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T