Nityanand Prasad Rana v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20440 of 2016 ====================================================== Nityanand Prasad Rana Son of Sri Jadish Pandit, Resident of Baidhi Sadan, Sharma Chwk, PO- Simari Bhakhtiyarpur, PS- Bhakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director Bihar Education Project Council, Patna. 5.

The Member of the District Teacher, Employment Authority, Saharsa District- Saharsa. 6.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa District- Saharsa. 7.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, District- Saharsa. 8.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Koshi Division, District- Saharsa. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Banma Itahri, District- Saharsa. 10.

The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Itahari, Block Manma Itahri, District- Saharsa. 11.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Itahari, Block- Banma Itahri District- Saharsa 12.

Sri Anil Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Narayan Yadav, VillagePO- Ithahri, PSSalakhua, Dist- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Ms. Rashmi Jha, Advocate Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Smt.Shilpa Singh-Ga12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

2. The matter is referred to the State Appellate Authority inasmuch as the writ application has been filed against the order dated 26.07.2013 passed in Appeal Case No. 28 of 2012 by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20440 of 2016(2) dt.17-05-2024 2/2 District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Saharsa which has not been challenged before the State Appellate Authority.

3. Regards being had to the nature of dispute, the petitioner is given liberty to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today.

4. If appeal is filed by the petitioner along with condonation of delay petition, the State Appellate Authority shall consider and dispose the same on its own merit within a reasonable time frame after giving opportunity of hearing to the persons concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is accordingly disposed.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U