Thakur Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13070 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- BANMANKHI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

THAKUR SHARMA Son of Nago Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. 2.

KAILU SHARMA Son of Nago Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. 3.

SANJIT SHARAMA Son of Nago Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. 4.

RANJIT SHARMA Son of Nago Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. 5.

NAGO SHARMA Son of Late Kari Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. 6.

PRABHU SHARMA Son of Late Kari Sharma Resident of Village - Dhima Mandhir Tola, Ward No.11, P.S.- Banmankhi, Distt.- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 324 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault due to which informant and her family members sustained injuries.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13070 of 2022(2) dt.05-09-2022 2/2 that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in respect of assault, there is no specific allegation against these petitioners. There is general and omnibus allegation against them.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Purnea in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 25 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T