Patna High CourtCWJC/19411/2016dismissed

Raj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19411 of 2016 =========================================================== Raj Kumar Ram, Son of Kamleshwari Ram, R/o Vill + P.O. Vishanpur, P.S. Bhaptiahi, District - Supaul.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Deptt. Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director (Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation), Govt. of Bihar.

5. The District Magistrate, Supaul.

6. The Rehabilitation Officer, Koshi Project, Supaul.

7. The District Education Officer, Supaul.

8. The Block Development Officer, Saraigarh Bhaptiahi.

9. The Block Education Officer, Saraigarh, Bhaptiahi. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 04-05-2017 In the matter of a communication issued by the Additional Collector, Supaul to the District Education Officer, Supaul on 19.10.2016, is a matter of construction of Primary School building and allotment of the area by the Rehabilitation Officer, Koshi Project, Supaul, petitioner wants this Court to intervene and restrain construction of the school in question in public interest. The issue in question is an executive and administrative issue to be decided by the Executive Authorities which is not related

Patna High Court CWJC No.19411 of 2016 dt.04-05-2017 2/2 to any statute, rule or regulation governing the issue in question and, therefore, in a Public Interest Litigation, exercising our extraordinary jurisdiction, we are not inclined to interfere into the matter. The petitioner may take up the issue with the highest authorities and it would be for the said authority to look into the grievance. With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 09.05.2017 Transmission Date