Anil Singh Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3417 of 2018 (3) dt.14-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3417 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -357 Year- 2017 Thana -BARACHATTI District- GAYA ====================================================== Anil Singh Yadav, Son of Sri Ram Sakal Singh Yadav, Resident of VillageMahuari, P.S.- Jamania, District- Gajipur (Uttar Pradesh). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Zonal Director, Narcotic Control Bureau, Patna. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Parties : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2017 in connection with Barachati P.S. Case No. 357 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 18, 20, 22, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 6 Kg. and 01 Kg. of Doda powder (Poppy straw) from two motorcycles neither of which belong to the petitioner. Similarly situated co-accused Anand Kumar, Vikash Kumar and Sonu Kumar have been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 47991 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 63606 of 2017 respectively.
4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 357 of 2017, on the following conditions:-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3417 of 2018 (3) dt.14-03-2018 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT U T