Tarun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Shri Pratyaya Amrit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.473 of 2026 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17930 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Tarun Kumar, Son of Chhedi Prasad Mandal, Resident of Village- Naraihia, P.S.- Pothia, District- Katihar.

2.

Manish Kumar, Son of Mantu Prasad Mandal, Resident of Village- Naraihia, P.S.- Pothia, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Shri Pratyaya Amrit father's name not known to the petitioners, the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Shri Dipak Kumar Singh, father's name not known to the petitioners, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Shri Ashutosh Dwedi, father's name not known to the petitioners, the District Magistrate, Katihar.

4.

Smt. Archana Kumari, father's name not known to the petitioners, the District Planning Officer, Katihar.

5.

Shri Asim Kumar, father's name not known to the petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Katihar. 6.

Shri Satendra Singh, father's name not known to the petitioners, the Block Development Officer, Sameli, District- Katihar. 7.

Shri Priyaranjan Kumar, father's name not known to the petitioners, the Circle Officer, Sameli, District- Katihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prabhat Kumar, AC to GP-6.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2026 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that in view of the statements made by opposite party nos. 2 and 5 in their affidavit, particularly from paragraph 12 onwards, the process of foreclosure of the scheme in question has already been initiated. So, in the present time the petitioners have no grievance and they want not to proceed with

Patna High Court MJC No.473 of 2026(4) dt.10-07-2026 2/2 this M.J.C. application against the opposite parties, so, in terms of the statements made by the opposite party nos. 2 and 5 in their show cause, the instant M.J.C. may be disposed of.

2. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the instant M.J.C application stands disposed of.

(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U