← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22644/2021bail granted

Shatrughn Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-19Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

(FROM RESIDENTIAL OFFICE VIA VIDEO APPLICATION) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22644 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2019 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Shatrughn Sahni Son Of Meghu Sahni Resident Of Village- Basanta Jehanabad, P.S.- Lalganj, District-Vaishali ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 19-08-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner, in the present case, is seeking regular bail in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 278/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a26/35 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested on the spot and it is alleged that he had fled away taking advantage of darkness. Police has shown recovery of one loaded country made pistol and a live cartridge from the motorcycle which was allegedly left by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22644 of 2021(2) dt.19-08-2021 2/3 petitioner and the co-accused. The co-accused Arun Rai @ Arun Ray has been granted bail by learned coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 13954/2021. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent but he is said to be on bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State has though opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner has remained in custody for about eight months in connection with this case and he has got one criminal antecedent in which he is said to be on bail, this Court directs release of the petitioner above named on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IX, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 278 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22644 of 2021(2) dt.19-08-2021 3/3 order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.