Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20194 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2016 Thana -BANSHI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Suraj Kumar, Son of Kaushal Sharma, Resident of Village- Orbigha, P.S. Banshi, (Karpi ), District- Arwal.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 18 of 2016, registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accusation is that in course of checking of the vehicles, Police gave signal to stop one motorcycle, on which three persons were boarded, but they started fleeing away leaving the motorcycle. On chase, one of them was caught hold by the Police, who disclosed his name as Suraj Kumar (Petitioner). Thereafter, Police demanded paper regarding ownership of the motorcycle, but petitioner did not produce any paper.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20194 of 2017 (5) dt.29-06-2017 2/2 fact, petitioner had purchased the said motorcycle from coaccused Bunty @ Kunal, but no paper was handed over to the petitioner by said Bunty @ Kunal. Further submission is that petitioner is in custody since 02.10.2016.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM, Arwal Jehanabad in connection with Banshi P.S. Case No. 18 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and further the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to remain present on two consecutive dates during the course of the trial without any reasonable cause being shown, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T