Dhananjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12229 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-248 Year-2019 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== DHANANJAY KUMAR Son of Ram Akbal Ram @ Ram Ekbal Ram Resident of Village-Jigina, P.S.-Mohania, District-Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bharat Bhushan(App156) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mohania P. S. Case No. 248 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely because he is husband of the deceased. As a matter of fact, he informed the informant side about the death of the deceased. The deceased might have committed suicide. Petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2019. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12229 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner is named accused and he being the husband was responsible for maintaining the deceased in which he failed. The post mortem report reflects ligature mark around the neck of the deceased and the cause of death has been mentioned as asphyxia by strangulation by ligature leading to cardiorespiratory failure. He, therefore, submits that petitioner does not deserve to be granted the privilege of bail. Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court does not find it to be a fit case for grant of bail to the petitioner. The same is, therefore, rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T