← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23146/2021bail granted

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23146 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2020 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar Yadav Son Of Sukhdeo Yadav @ Sugdev Yadav R/O Village- Maura Kabiyahi, P.S.- Shankarpur, District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP For Opp. Party No.2 :

Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For Opp. Party No.3 :

Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No.146 of 2020 registered for offences under Sections 379 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Paragraph 5 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State Bank of India reads as follows:- "That in the aforesaid context first of all it is stated that the C.S.P. (Customer Service Point) of the petitioner is not linked to the State Bank of India but the same is linked to another bank. Secondly, none of the person/agency linked to State Bank of India or the official of the State Bank of India is involved in the subject transactions. Transactions were off-us. From perusal of the data obtained by the State Bank of India through the concern sources with respect to the transactions made in the saving bank's account of the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23146 of 2021(8) dt.19-04-2022 2/3 during the relevant period, i.e. from 23.04.2020 to 01.06.2020, it transpires that Rs.10,000/- on 23.04.2020, Rs.10,000/- on 24.04.2020 and Rs.2,100/- on 25.04.2020 were debited through the biometric (fingerprint) Micros-ATMs linked with Yes Bank through Rekha Devi, Ward No.08, Sultanpur, Ghataho, Samastipur (Bihar). Further, Rs.500/- on 04.05.2020 and Rs.135/- on 01.06.2020 were debited through the biometric (fingerprint) Micro-ATMs linked with the IndusInd Bank through Sri Amardeep Kumar, Ward No.05, Sihpur, Madhepura (Bihar)."

From reading of the aforesaid paragraph, it appears that the petitioner is innocent.

In these circumstances, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

Accordingly, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No.146 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhepura is directed to get further investigation of Singheshwar P.S. Case No.146 of 2020 done in the light of the aforesaid statement made by the State Bank of India in the counter affidavit.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23146 of 2021(8) dt.19-04-2022 3/3 With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura for its compliance through FAX and e-mail forthwith.

Mr. Madan Kumar, learned APP for the State, is directed to communicate this order to the Superintendent of Police, Madhepura through WhatsApp and on telephone. (Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T