Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15674 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2023 Thana- SUIYA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.
Renu Devi D/O- Late Jyotish Goswami R/O- Village- Jeruwa, P.S.- Suiya, Dist.- Banka 2.
Kajal Kumari D/O- Late Jyotish Goswami R/O- Village- Jeruwa, P.S.- Suiya, Dist.- Banka 3.
Sunita Devi W/O- Late Jyotish Goswami R/O- Village- Jeruwa, P.S.- Suiya, Dist.- Banka 4.
Bikash Goswami S/O- Late Jyotish Goswami R/O- Village- Jeruwa, P.S.- Suiya, Dist.- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Suiya P.S. Case no. 146 of 2023 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant got
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15674 of 2024(2) dt.13-03-2024 2/3 information that his daughter has been assaulted by the accused persons then he along with his son went to the house of the petitioner where co-accused Rupesh Kumar gave lathi blow on the head of the informant and the petitioner no. 3- Sunita Devi had assaulted the son of the informant by the iron rod and petitioner no. 4 committed theft of mobile and ornament of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the informant is father-in-law of the petitioner no. 4 and due to some family dispute between the parties, this case has been lodged. He also submits that no injury report brought by the prosecution which shows that there is no injury on the informant and upon his son. He further submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15674 of 2024(2) dt.13-03-2024 3/3 of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Banka in connection with Suiya P.S. Case no. 146 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) ashishkr/- U T