Kumar Raghav, v. Veenus,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.306 of 2020 ====================================================== Kumar Raghav, Son of Arvinda Kumar, Resident of village- Ward No. 3, College Chowk, Madhepura, Police Station- Madhepura Sadar, DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

Veenus, Wife of Kumar Raghav, Daughter of Rajeev Ranjan, Resident of Village - Ratanpura, Police Station- Madhepura (Gailadh), DistrictMadhepura. ... ... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner is husband of opposite party, Veenus. He has filed Divorce Case No. 09/2016.

A petition has been filed by opposite party to recall the witnesses examined on behalf of the petitioner, on the ground that for treatment she was in Delhi and it was the reason that she could not examine the witnesses produced by the petitioner. A number of medical papers were filed before the learned court below and after being satisfied that she was genuinely been deprived from cross-examining the witnesses produced on behalf of the petitioner, the learned court below provided opportunity to the opposite party to cross-examine the witnesses produced by the petitioner and allowed her

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.306 of 2020(2) dt.11-04-2022 2/2 petition.

I do not see any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, it is dismissed. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U