← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36588/2017bail granted

Bhola Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-08-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36588 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -612 Year- 2014 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Bhola Ram Son of Puran Ram @ Nathuni Ram R/o Village- Dhamaur, P.S.- Nichalaul, District- Maharajganj, (Uttar Pradesh). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shobha Devi W/o Bhola Ram, R/o Village- Dhamaur, P.S.- Nichalaul, District- Maharajganj (U.P.).

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate. For the State : Smt. Reena Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 24.01.2017 in connection with Tr. No. 3209 of 2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. 612/2014 for the offences instituted under Section 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the complainant due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2017 and the charge sheet has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36588 of 2017 (2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 been submitted in the present case. He has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Tr. No. 3209/2016, arising out of Complaint Case No. C-612/2014.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T